Gadgets and passwords; it’s worth the hassle

How many mobile devices do you own? Whether it’s an iPhone, MacBook Air, laptop, kindle or iPad – these hand-held gadgets are convenient and offer easy access to the internet, personal and professional calendars and online banking amongst other things.

Now imagine your daily life without that iPhone or iPad. What if it dropped out of your pocket on the bus? Or what if you absentmindedly left it on the table at the library? What sort of information does that hand-held device contain?

The importance of password protection has never been greater, especially considering the amount of personal and professional information now stored in the palm of your hand. A recent article in the Brisbane Times outlined some of the risks associated with these easily accessible devices and the clear need for password protection.

In the article, Adam Turner points out that, “Typing in a password every time you want to use your gadgets is a hassle, but leaving them unlocked is clearly a risk.”

Protecting your financial and personal information can be easy by taking a few simple precautions. Make sure your phones and other mobile devices are protected by passwords. It may take you a few extra seconds to access your Facebook profile or gmail account but it may also prevent an unintended user from accessing your accounts as well.

What’s your online identity worth?

A recent blog post by Vancouver Sun tech reporter, Gillian Shaw, prompted several valid questions around online identity.

Shaw outlines the ways in which online social media sites like Facebook and Twitter treat your personal identity as though it were currency. While there is no monetary charge involved with signing up for a Facebook or Twitter account, the sites do impose another cost – that of your online privacy.

By collecting information about what articles you read, what sites you visit and particularly in the case of Google, tracking the topics of your emails, your preferences and ad value are assessed. Have you ever wondered why you suddenly see wedding advertisements on the side bar of your gmail account after sending an email to your friend about her bachelorette party? That’s because Google is offering their services as an aggregator and in this case, the information they are aggregating is all about you.

Shaw spoke with Simon Fraser University communication professor Peter Chow-White to get some perspective on the relative awareness that most young people have as to the privacy settings on sites like Facebook.

Chow-White told Shaw that, “Some of them don’t know the consequences of sharing everything, especially as their digital footprint or digital identity will be walking into the room with them on job applications.”

While online sharing is in fact integral to networking in a digital age, the fact remains that it’s up to an individual to take control of their digital identity.

Check your privacy settings and think twice about what you post. With a little bit of knowledge, you can ensure that your online identity is a positive one – maybe even worth a new job!

 

Parents Rushing to Buy Baby Domain Names

Forget about strollers and high chairs for baby’s first birthday – according to a recent interview on KVAL.com, more and more parents are purchasing domain names and establishing Twitter accounts for their new born babies.

Warren Adelman, president and Chief Operating Officer of GoDaddy.com, told KVAL that “the domain name is like 21st century real estate, 21st century identity.”

Parents are realizing that they have the ability to establish their child’s digital identity at a young age – in some instances, in utero. It might start off as sharing images from an ultra-sound on Facebook or creating a baby blog. Regardless of the intention, the fact remains that with each image, each blog post, each tweet, their child’s  ‘Digital Tattoo’ is crafted - an indelible mark that may follow them wherever their future leads.

Websites like babyurl.net are designed to provide parents with information on how to go about securing domain names and establishing their child’s digital identity. But what the site seems to lack, is an awareness around how to protect that identity.

The internet provides parents with a great opportunity to foster a positive online presence for their baby while sharing milestones with friends and family. Parents should be aware, however, that with a digital identity comes the responsibility of stewardship – both for their digital tattoo, and that of their baby.

Easy Tips for Maintaining a Positive Online Identity

A recent article on Schools.com discussed the importance of being aware of your online identity, especially in an age where everyone from graduate school admissions officers to prospective employers can easily access information you may have intentionally excluded from the application.

With the click of a mouse, a simple Google search can produce photos, blog posts, tweets and other seemingly personal information that you’d rather leave out of the interview. Schools.com offered a few tips on how to maintain good face when it comes to your internet persona.

For starters, get into the habit of performing a Google search on yourself every month. It might sound a bit egotistical at first glance, but it’s the best way to know what information is circulating on the web. If there are photos or comments you’d like removed, contact the web site administrator immediately and ask for them to be taken down.

As tempting as it might be to post those photos from the party Friday night, think twice before uploading. How would you feel if your grandmother or professor caught a glimpse? Now imagine having some of your Facebook photos printed, lying infront of you at a job interview. If the thought of that makes you squirm, you may want to re-think your posting habits.

But it’s not all defense when it comes to crafting your online identity. The beauty of online publishing is the ease (and price tag) associated with building your online rep. Get proactive and start branding yourself with positive content. The more positive information available online, the more difficult it becomes to find the negative stuff.

Check out additional information on how to beef up your security settings on some of your favorite social networks and take ownership of your Digital Tattoo.

 

Exploring the Online Identity Ecosystem

We all know what it’s like to forget our username or password for one of the dozens of online accounts we access on a regular basis. From ebay and Linked-in to Twitter and vimeo, our online information is often organized into silos disconnected from one another and requiring separate log-in practices.

The “Identity 2.0″ movement calls for an integration of these various passwords and usernames into one standard form of identification that can be used on multiple websites. Canadian software developer, Dick Hardt, provided a brilliantly simple presentation explaining the logic behind this user generated model. Essentially, the transition would result in online users having something akin to a drivers license or photo id when checking into an online account. The digital identification card would be used across multiple platforms and serve as username and password for various websites, simplifying the log-in practice and streamlining digital identities.

Of course one of the main concerns from critics of the “Identity 2.0″ movement revolves around risks associated with using the same password for multiple websites. If the password or digital identification was to be intercepted, then it might be possible to hack into anything from an online banking account to facebook and personal email accounts.

Some of these concerns and issues, as well as the potential payoffs, are discussed by industry professionals on Digital ID News. Familiarize yourself with the movement and the ramifications of “Identity 2.0″ so that you can prepare for the new online ecosystem.

 

 

 

The online crusader

You may have never heard of Christopher Soghoian but if you ever run into him, be sure to thank him for protecting your privacy.

The 30-year-old technologist and PhD candidate was recently highlighted in a Wired Magazine article for his tenacious crusade in the name of online privacy. While many of us are busy sending text messages, updating our Facebook status and sharing documents on the cloud, Soghoian is hard at work trying to hack into these sites.

His aim is not to steal personal information or assume another identity, but rather to prove to large online entities how easy it might be for someone of a lesser moral caliber to do just that.

He tests the security of sites like Google, Facebook and even the federal government, documenting the breaches and publicizing the risk all in the name of protecting everyday online users like you and me. In many cases, his efforts have resulted in changes to privacy policies and standards.

Soghoian’s most recent project, PrivacyReports.org, is made possible by a George Soros Open Society Foundations fellowship. The website will be a user friendly source of information on how telecom companies and ISP servers measure up when it comes to protecting the online identity and privacy of their users. As quoted in Wired Magazine, Soghoian says, “Visitors will be able to know how long providers are retaining their text messages and whether they provide law enforcement easy access to your location data.” He went onto say, “People have a right to know what companies aren’t telling them. My hope is that after a year, once I have the data up and it’s proving to be useful, I can give it to the ACLU or someone like that to run.”

 

 

Re-thinking your Password Prowess

A recent Digital Life blog post on the Sydney Morning Herald website posed an important question around the strength of online passwords.

Clearly, this isn’t the first time that the author of the blog, Adam Turner, has addressed this issue as he states:

“I’ve lost track of the number of times I’ve read about the importance of strong passwords, but it seems the message still isn’t getting through to many people. According to recent analysis of millions of stolen passwords, the most popular passwords are still “password”, “123456”, “12345678”, “qwerty” and “abc123”.”

The importance of maintaining strong and unique passwords for all of your online accounts must not be underestimated. In a world of online banking, shopping and  socializing, remembering all of the different passwords can be a daunting task but Turner warns people not to fall prey to the temptation of using the same password for everything. “The PlayStation Network hack is a classic example of why this is a bad idea, as you can be sure that hackers will use the email/password combinations to try to access other services such as email, Facebook and online shopping,” Turner wrote.

Check out the Digital Tattoo page on outsmarting potential identity thieves to learn more about how you can protect yourself online. In the meantime, revisit those passwords and consider complicating things a bit. If you’re worried about forgetting the new upscaled versions, you can write them down but be sure to keep the list in a secure place.

 

Connecting Social Media and Canadian Supreme Court Ruling

A decision issued on October 19 by the Supreme Court of Canada stated that writers and publishers cannot be held liable for online publications that hyperlink to defamatory content.

While the world of professional online writers and publishers were gasping a sigh of relief in the wake of the court’s ruling, the unprecedented decision likely slipped past the everyday Twitter and Facebook user – even though it pertains just as much to their daily online publishing activities as it does to professional bloggers and media outlets.

Did you know that every time you “tweet” or post something to Facebook you are acting as an online publisher? Make sure you know the responsibilities that accompany online activity and be sure to stay up to date on decisions that affect your accountability.

 

Facebook Aims to Simplify Privacy Settings

This from the nytimes bits blog. Facebook is attempting to clarify their privacy settings. Now when you post something, you’ll have the option to choose who sees each particular post – the public, friends, or custom made (spherical-shaped) groups. The changes are supposed to roll out on Thursday.

In other news, nothing much else has changed about Facebook and they still make money off the data they keep from spying on their users.

Pseudonymity in Social Networks

Lately, many people have been writing about the naming policies of social networks. This is because Google+ requires its users to use their real names in their profiles. Facebook does too.

Online, our names are tightly and persistently coupled with our actions. Pseudonyms put a measure of distance between our identity online and our real identity. For some, this is necessary and desired. And as Alex Madrigal, writing for The Atlantic argues the policy of using real names online is actually a revolutionary concept.

danah boyd writes that real name policies on social networks are an abuse of power. The people who most heavily rely on pseudonyms in online spaces are those who are most marginalized by systems of power. Having a pseudonym is important for many people and many reasons.

Even if pseudonyms are allowed, however, we are still identifiable by other means. We do not control the data gathered from the services we use. And what we share and with whom we share it can be used to identify us in surprising ways. As Eben Moglen, law professor and Chairman of the Software Freedom Law Center, brilliantly describes, having privacy is more than just keeping one single thing about us a secret – whether it’s our name, our location or even our sexual orientation:

“[The] problem is all the stuff that’s the cruft, the data dandruff of life, that we don’t think of as secret in any way but which aggregates to stuff that we don’t want anybody to know about us. Which aggregates, in fact, not just to stuff we don’t want people to know but to predictive models about us that we would be very creeped out could exist at all.”

This is not to say anonymity (and pseudonymity) are a lost cause and not worth fighting for. Far from it. Perhaps though, we’re missing a larger picture. The way our Internet is structured – with all of our data concentrated in virtualized servers owned by companies offering client minions like us “free” services – means that, ultimately, pseudonym or not, Facebook and Google still own us (and know who we are).