Tag Archives: social_network

Google+ : Facebook :: ____ : ____

Exploring Google+, the just released social networking service from Google is like walking through an unfinished house. The frame is there but it’s missing the people and pictures on the walls that make it a home. As the invites roll out and more people sign up though, that’s sure to change. Still, even just the basic frame of the social network is enough to indicate that Google may have created something that can finally hold its own against Facebook.

Here’s a + review and a - one.

Google+, while similar in many respects to Facebook, offers important differences that could appeal to users wary of sharing too much of their information online. The service allows you to organize your friends, acquaintances, colleagues and family members in separate social spheres. It then gives you control over which content is shared with whom. Your contacts don’t see which social “circle” of yours they’ve been placed in, so the focus is more on the actual communication and sharing happening in your circles and less on the conversations that you are not involved in directly. At least that’s what I extrapolate from the brief time I spent playing around with the service last night.

For a brief tour of the Google+ project, check out the video below, Adria Richards’ first look at Google+.

The technology is only half the picture. And how or whether people actually use the circles, hangout, and sparks features remains to be seen. For me though, I appreciate a social network that accommodates the various flavours of human relationships I encounter in my daily life – beyond the simple, and now meaningless, online brand of “friend”. With the status out of the way, the emphasis is on the interaction. As one review eloquently put it, it seems less “‘Love me! Love me!’ and more ‘People I love: Let’s chill.’” Whether Google+ lives up to this ideal remains to be seen.

Every social networking service is what you make of it and I imagine both the engineering of the site and the personalities who use it make all the difference. Still I am excited and optimistic about Google’s latest contribution to the social media landscape.

Long live our benevolent corporate overlords!

The Best Social Media Statistics for 2011

Over at Ragan’s PR daily, Adam Vincenzini has released an interesting collection of social media statistics for this year. Among my favorites:

  • 80% of internet users participate in groups, compared with 56% of non-internet users. Moreover, social media users are even more likely to be active: 82% of social network users and 85% of Twitter users are group participants.
  • [linebreak]

  • 89% (!) of Japanese Internet users have said they are wary of using their internet names online.
  • [linebreak]

  • A survey of more than 2,000 mothers over the age of 40 found that a majority have more Facebook friends than their children, and that they know how to better take advantage of their presence on the site.
  • [linebreak]

  • The Pew Internet and American Life Project found that people 74 and older represent the fastest growing demographic on the sites. Sixteen percent of Internet users in that age group now visit them, compared with four percent in 2008.
  • [linebreak]

  • Geolocation users are 38% more likely than the average US online adult to say that friends and family ask their opinions before making a purchase decision.

What are your favorites?
[linebreak]

Posting from home gets workers fired

Social Networking has expanded the reach of employee/employer relations.

Two workers at a BC car dealership were recently terminated for making abusive and defamatory comments about their boss on their Facebook pages while outside of work.

Yahoo.ca noted that the employee’s boss caught wind of the comments through the extended networks of the Facebook friends of each of the recently released. Read the story here.

It is always wise not to post anything defamatory or over-personal on Facebook. In the event that you can’t resist, however, at the very least check your privacy settings so that extended networks can’t read what you thought was a conversation between friends.

Controversial South African threatens to shut Twitter

Phweeter: an imposter tweeter

Julius Malema, the controversial youth leader of South Africa’s governing ANC (and recent hate speech convict), is battling a new front to salvage his reputation – this time against Twitter. The divisive politicien has threatened to shut Twitter down if it does not address the not one, not two, but 12 phweeters tweeting in his name.

Twitter has a policy that allows for satire, phweet accounts, and parody tweeting, so long as phweeters clearly identify themselves as phweeters. It is unlikely that Twitter will take the Malema threats seriously reports the BBC due to the popularity of the site, and well, lets face it, Malema’s own reputation as a defamatory public figure.

Here is a link to some infamous Phweeter accounts, including former Russian President Vladimir Putin, George Bush, and Mao Zedong.

Word of Mouse

This blog is just a quick shout out to the unheralded good social media and social networks have brought to the consumer world. While privacy advocates bemoan access to anonymous personal information for advertisement profiling, network users have struck back en masse at ‘the man’ with a bit of profiling of their own.

By using the web to give thumbs up or thumbs down on chat forums, you tube and even personal pages, the web is now the new version of small town word of mouth for big business. The threat of a customer complaint going viral on the web has led to a host of major companies hiring staff to troll the net for unsavory grievances with the intent to find and appease the offended. The greater the complaint, the greater the reward.

Check out the story here.

“Rules: 16+, stay fully clothed.”

Those are the rules – Welcome to Chatroulette.com

With all the hype and infamy about this site, I decide I should check it out for myself.  I went to the page. It asked me to allow Chatroulette access to my camera and microphone. I read the rules listed above and gave it a second thought.

I got nervous. I couldn’t do it. I clicked ‘deny’ instead of ‘allow’ and the screen remained blank. Staring into the web vortex waiting for a random stranger brought back all the fears and nerves of several bombed high school speech contests – not to mention the fact the site has a reputation for chatters appearing naked.

A 17-year-old Russian high school student, Andrey Ternovskiy, created the site. He said he got the name and idea based on the dare-devil game, Russian Roulette, which involves a handgun, six chambers, six players, and one bullet.

The site has garnered over 1.5 million unique users since 2009 and at any given moment is thought to have 35,000 users on-line chatting randomly using their web cams and on board microphones. One of Chatroulette’s greatest appeals is the option to switch instantly to another person, an action called ‘nexting,‘ with the click of a button. Nexting a person keeps the chat ball rolling. The site was an instant web phenomena and international press coverage has made the founder a web celeb.

The overwhelming majority of chatters are male, and a recent system of flagging graphic content has been added to limit an abundance of offensive and restricted material demonstrated by chatters.

If you have had any unique encounters on Chatroulette, please tell us in the comment section below.

Students Punished for Posts

Facebook’s 500 million users are slowly becoming aware that the web is not private space. The BBC recently reported that 16 high school students in India were each given three month suspensions for making ‘rude’ statements about a female teacher through the comment section on their profiles. Examples like this are more common than people think.

More than 15% of young adults have said they have had personal messages, texts, and posts forwarded without their permission or viewed by outsiders. If you wouldn’t say it in public, you might consider whether or not you should say it online. If you can’t resist, however, sites like ratemyprofessors.com provide a degree of anonymity that far surpass that of one’s Facebook wall.

Read the story here.

Faceological profile

We have all dabbled in it from time to time – social profiling others based on their social profiles. Our on-line identity is like our real identity. What we post is like what we wear. So who are you based on your FB profile photo?

A new study out of Oxford University has shown some interesting results:

1% of people are smoking in their pictures.

5% of people are drinking in their photos.

People under 30 are twice as likely to have partying photos than those who are older.

People over 30 are twice as likely to have baby photos than those who are younger.

Men are 50% more likely to edit their profile photos and 20% less likely to be smiling.

Having an ‘in a relationship’ status increased the chances of a smiling photo by 35%.

Stats compiled by the BBC.

Thus, if your FB photo has been altered, you have a drink in your hand, and you are not smiling, you are more likely than not a single male under 30.

Another recent study on Facebook has drawn even stronger conclusions, saying chronic FB users are more likely than others to be narcissists and/or suffering from low self-esteem.

Facebook has over 500,000,000 users, nearly half the population of China.

Can’t block Zuckerberg

Creating the most successful social networking site of all time has its perks – the ability to view any users’ photos or personal information.

In the fracas over Facebook’s recent privacy woes, its has been reported by Tech Crunch that the only person users cannot block on Facebook is the creator. Like Myspace’s infamous ‘Tom,’ Mark Zuckerberg is your ‘friend’ whether you like it or not.

Imagine the power. Hollywood stars, pray he does not become paparazzi.

Are we as connected as we think?

A great article appeared on the BBC website this past week discussing the most recent TED talks in which Harvard academic, Ethan Zuckerman, said that the Internet is not living up to its ‘promise.’ His argument is an interesting one.

[linebreak]

Highlighting social behavior on the net, Zuckerman said the social world of internet users is getting narrower, not broader as is commonly assumed, because individuals tailor their networks to like minded people and ideas rather than opening themselves up to different communities or alternatvie opinions. Likewise, he said that rather than ‘democratize’ the media by allowing anyone to contribute,  media representation from the poorest parts of the world is signifficantly dropping compared to wealthier places.

[linebreak]

In a nutshell, Zuckerman said that internet users are not as connected as they think, and that the world wide web is not as wide as once thought. Check out his talk here and weigh in.