Tag Archives: facebook

Clickjacking

  • All my privacy settings are in place–how is spam still making it’s way onto my Facebook?
  • Are all the links posted by my friends to my Facebook newsfeed trustworthy?
  • Do I think before I click?
  • How do I know if I’m being clickjacked?

Consider these questions as you review the examples below. Try the quiz from the left menu: What Have You Learned? after you’ve spent some time with this section.

Clickjacking attacks, from the term “click hijacking,” are more common than you think. Watch the video to learn more about it.  Reflect on the questions above as you watch. Then review the Think Before You Ink section before checking your understanding at the bottom of the page.

Video posted by: Symantec

  • Facebook is full of people actively sharing ideas and connecting with each other. Though brimming with discussion and thought, networks of this much connectivity also involve people who see an opportunity to capitalize on people who are quick to share with others.
  • Be wary of enticing messages, even if they seem to come from the profiles of your friends.
  • Anything that asks you to install or fill out something additional is likely a scam.
  • Use updated versions of your Internet browser and its plugins (eg. Flash) — older versions will not contain the most recent security updates and are more susceptible to clickjacking attacks.
  • Downloadable clickjacking detection/prevention software is available, such as Comitari Web Protection Suite-Home LE (Limited Edition) and NoScript.
  • If you do fall for a clickjacking attack, remove the page from your “Likes and Interests” and go through your wall, deleting all malicious links.
What have you learned in this section? Take the quiz:

Connecting Social Media and Canadian Supreme Court Ruling

A decision issued on October 19 by the Supreme Court of Canada stated that writers and publishers cannot be held liable for online publications that hyperlink to defamatory content.

While the world of professional online writers and publishers were gasping a sigh of relief in the wake of the court’s ruling, the unprecedented decision likely slipped past the everyday Twitter and Facebook user – even though it pertains just as much to their daily online publishing activities as it does to professional bloggers and media outlets.

Did you know that every time you “tweet” or post something to Facebook you are acting as an online publisher? Make sure you know the responsibilities that accompany online activity and be sure to stay up to date on decisions that affect your accountability.

 

Pseudonymity in Social Networks

Lately, many people have been writing about the naming policies of social networks. This is because Google+ requires its users to use their real names in their profiles. Facebook does too.

Online, our names are tightly and persistently coupled with our actions. Pseudonyms put a measure of distance between our identity online and our real identity. For some, this is necessary and desired. And as Alex Madrigal, writing for The Atlantic argues the policy of using real names online is actually a revolutionary concept.

danah boyd writes that real name policies on social networks are an abuse of power. The people who most heavily rely on pseudonyms in online spaces are those who are most marginalized by systems of power. Having a pseudonym is important for many people and many reasons.

Even if pseudonyms are allowed, however, we are still identifiable by other means. We do not control the data gathered from the services we use. And what we share and with whom we share it can be used to identify us in surprising ways. As Eben Moglen, law professor and Chairman of the Software Freedom Law Center, brilliantly describes, having privacy is more than just keeping one single thing about us a secret – whether it’s our name, our location or even our sexual orientation:

“[The] problem is all the stuff that’s the cruft, the data dandruff of life, that we don’t think of as secret in any way but which aggregates to stuff that we don’t want anybody to know about us. Which aggregates, in fact, not just to stuff we don’t want people to know but to predictive models about us that we would be very creeped out could exist at all.”

This is not to say anonymity (and pseudonymity) are a lost cause and not worth fighting for. Far from it. Perhaps though, we’re missing a larger picture. The way our Internet is structured – with all of our data concentrated in virtualized servers owned by companies offering client minions like us “free” services – means that, ultimately, pseudonym or not, Facebook and Google still own us (and know who we are).

Missouri Outlaws student-teacher Facebook Friendship

A law in Missouri was recently passed that makes it illegal for teachers to be “friends” with students on any social networking site that allows private communication. Here’s the complete story from NPR news. The larger bill was passed with great support because it was designed to protect children from predatory teachers.

But as one teacher points out, a teacher’s job is to reach out to students and that means going where they are. Today, students do not use email as much and have instead turned to social networking sites to communicate. Instead of protecting children, the new law may be hurting them by limiting a students ability to contact teachers if they need help.

Google+ : Facebook :: ____ : ____

Exploring Google+, the just released social networking service from Google is like walking through an unfinished house. The frame is there but it’s missing the people and pictures on the walls that make it a home. As the invites roll out and more people sign up though, that’s sure to change. Still, even just the basic frame of the social network is enough to indicate that Google may have created something that can finally hold its own against Facebook.

Here’s a + review and a - one.

Google+, while similar in many respects to Facebook, offers important differences that could appeal to users wary of sharing too much of their information online. The service allows you to organize your friends, acquaintances, colleagues and family members in separate social spheres. It then gives you control over which content is shared with whom. Your contacts don’t see which social “circle” of yours they’ve been placed in, so the focus is more on the actual communication and sharing happening in your circles and less on the conversations that you are not involved in directly. At least that’s what I extrapolate from the brief time I spent playing around with the service last night.

For a brief tour of the Google+ project, check out the video below, Adria Richards’ first look at Google+.

The technology is only half the picture. And how or whether people actually use the circles, hangout, and sparks features remains to be seen. For me though, I appreciate a social network that accommodates the various flavours of human relationships I encounter in my daily life – beyond the simple, and now meaningless, online brand of “friend”. With the status out of the way, the emphasis is on the interaction. As one review eloquently put it, it seems less “‘Love me! Love me!’ and more ‘People I love: Let’s chill.’” Whether Google+ lives up to this ideal remains to be seen.

Every social networking service is what you make of it and I imagine both the engineering of the site and the personalities who use it make all the difference. Still I am excited and optimistic about Google’s latest contribution to the social media landscape.

Long live our benevolent corporate overlords!

Facebook Now Adding a Secure Connection

Big news in Facebook security settings. And it’s positive!

Last week, Facebook announced they will offer users a more secure connection – encrypted HTTPS protocol instead of HTTP protocol. Similar to the type of secure connection you have when you do online banking, this protocol prevents others from capturing your “cookie” and accessing your account when you use an open wireless network at a coffeeshop, library or other public place. Here’s what it looks like:

It’s a good idea to enable this secure connection – especially if you are using an unsecured wifi network when you log on to Facebook. To select this option, go to “Account Settings”, select “Account Security”, then check the box for “Secure Browsing”. Facebook will be rolling this feature out to all users over the next few weeks. If you don’t see it available now, check back soon.

Posting from home gets workers fired

Social Networking has expanded the reach of employee/employer relations.

Two workers at a BC car dealership were recently terminated for making abusive and defamatory comments about their boss on their Facebook pages while outside of work.

Yahoo.ca noted that the employee’s boss caught wind of the comments through the extended networks of the Facebook friends of each of the recently released. Read the story here.

It is always wise not to post anything defamatory or over-personal on Facebook. In the event that you can’t resist, however, at the very least check your privacy settings so that extended networks can’t read what you thought was a conversation between friends.

Malicious troller convicted

Facebook vandal, Colm Coss, 38, was recently sentenced to 18 months in prison in the UK for posting abusive comments on commemorative webpages. The BBC reports that his comments were prosecuted according to a legal interpretation known as “malicious communications.” Read the story here.

Anyone who posts perverse comments is bound to end up with a poor internet reputation, but it might be news to some that internet vandalism could also land a person in jail.

Trolling is the practice of setting up fake internet social identities and then using that identity to harass, provoke, insult and abuse an on-line community or group. For more information check out communitiesonline.homestead.com and the Journal of Politeness Research.

Students Punished for Posts

Facebook’s 500 million users are slowly becoming aware that the web is not private space. The BBC recently reported that 16 high school students in India were each given three month suspensions for making ‘rude’ statements about a female teacher through the comment section on their profiles. Examples like this are more common than people think.

More than 15% of young adults have said they have had personal messages, texts, and posts forwarded without their permission or viewed by outsiders. If you wouldn’t say it in public, you might consider whether or not you should say it online. If you can’t resist, however, sites like ratemyprofessors.com provide a degree of anonymity that far surpass that of one’s Facebook wall.

Read the story here.

Faceological profile

We have all dabbled in it from time to time – social profiling others based on their social profiles. Our on-line identity is like our real identity. What we post is like what we wear. So who are you based on your FB profile photo?

A new study out of Oxford University has shown some interesting results:

1% of people are smoking in their pictures.

5% of people are drinking in their photos.

People under 30 are twice as likely to have partying photos than those who are older.

People over 30 are twice as likely to have baby photos than those who are younger.

Men are 50% more likely to edit their profile photos and 20% less likely to be smiling.

Having an ‘in a relationship’ status increased the chances of a smiling photo by 35%.

Stats compiled by the BBC.

Thus, if your FB photo has been altered, you have a drink in your hand, and you are not smiling, you are more likely than not a single male under 30.

Another recent study on Facebook has drawn even stronger conclusions, saying chronic FB users are more likely than others to be narcissists and/or suffering from low self-esteem.

Facebook has over 500,000,000 users, nearly half the population of China.