Facebook Privacy Vote

Image Credit : Facebook.com

It’s not often that a social media site asks it’s users opinions about privacy settings. What many people don’t know about Facebook is that the sites governance and policy allows users to vote on major changes. Well, users did have voting rights on facebook but those are set to disappear. Thanks to poor turn out to, you guessed it, vote.  This vote to protect voting opened last week and is set to close tomorrow at noon. Perhaps this was done intentionally as users lose the ability to vote on site governance if fewer than 300 million people vote.

So what exactly is at stake here?

According to Tech Crunch the vote covers changes to data sharing with affiliates (such as Instagram), who can send users messages, in addition to the changes of site governance.  The largest change is that user voting will no longer directly effect the site. While Facebook was far from a democracy, the sites experiment on user influence in social networking was groundbreaking. Facebook hopes to continue to listen to the needs of  it’s users after the vote. However, users will have lost any direct way of changing site policy.

The current number of votes stands at just over 600,000. The needed 30% or three million appears to be an unreachable goal. Voting ends tomorrow at noon. Will you be casting your vote?

 Vote here!

Snapchat Safety

Video Source: NBC.com

Nowadays apps go in and out of style quicker than clothing trends. Faster than you can finish a round of draw something, the next big application is making waves. The latest trend in apps is “Snapchat’. Currently the fifth most popular app on the Apple app store. During this years American Thanksgiving the app posted four times as many photos as instagram.

Snapchat is a photo sharing application were the photos are only view-able for a brief period of up to ten seconds. These images are designed for quick quirky pictures intended for the receivers eyes only. Snapchat markets itself as being “instantly fun and insanely playful. Show your friends how clever you can be and enjoy the lightness of being!”  The problem with this new found “lightness of being’ is that it promises to ease the trail of each photo sent. This promise of anonymity is creating the belief that the app is a safe way to send naked or sexual photos.

The app discourages screen-caps, alerting the sender whenever one was taken. Despite these few safeguards screen-caps are still possible to take. A much simpler method would be using a second phone to take a picture of the snapchat which leaves no trace. Knowing someone saved your snapchats is just the beginning, once images are uploaded to the internet they are nearly impossible to erase.
The majority of users don’t use snapchat to sext. It is after all a fun way to send goofy pictures to your friends. Just remember there is not safe way to sext. Every time explicit photos are taken they risk ending up on the internet. Keep snapchats for silly selfies and pictures of campus squirrels.

Facebook Privacy Spam

Recently your Facebook friends may have posted something that looks like legal jargon to their timeline   There were many variations that sprung up but the majority of timeline posts read as such-

For those of you who do not understand the reasoning behind this posting, Facebook is now a publicly traded entity. Unless you state otherwise, anyone can infringe on your right to privacy once you post to this site. It is recommended that you and other members post a similar notice as this, or you may copy and paste this version. If you do not post such a statement once, then you are indirectly…allowing public use of items such as your photos and the information contained in your status updates.

PRIVACY NOTICE: Warning – any person and/or institution and/or Agent and/or Agency of any governmental structure including but not limited to the United States Federal Government also using or monitoring/using this website or any of its associated websites, you do NOT have my permission to utilize any of my profile information nor any of the content contained herein including, but not limited to my photos, and/or the comments made about my photos or any other “picture” art posted on my profile.

You are hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing, disseminating, or taking any other action against me with regard to this profile and the contents herein. The foregoing prohibitions also apply to your employee, agent, student or any personnel under your direction or control.

The contents of this profile are private and legally privileged and confidential information, and the violation of my personal privacy is punishable by law. UCC 1-103 1-308 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE”

–taken from Facebook via slate.com

Looks impressive right? Looks can be deceiving as the majority of terms and laws cited either don’t exist or are completely misrepresented. Scopes.com explains that Facebook doesn’t own your work however, it does have the rights to use your work at any time in any way.

The message quickly went viral due to users who were trying to protect their privacy or at least that spamming the message “couldn’t hurt”. In a way they were right, the worst causalities of the scam were the other Facebook users who were bombarded with post after post of riled up users hoping to protect their media. Posts, pictures and any other content uploaded to Facebook is all in the public domain according to the agreement a user signs when they register for the site. The viral nature of the faux privacy notice signifies that users of social networks are becoming more protective of what they post online.

There isn’t way to undo your agreement with Facebook or any other social networking site. Even deleting your account doesn’t give you back the rights that you formally ceded. If you want to retain exclusive rights to your work or keep your information private, don’t share online!

Is Facebook adding more stress in your social life?

The University of Edinburgh’s business school just released a report that the more friends you have online, the more stress you have. The reason being is the fear that you might offend someone. As social media grows to include one seventh of the worlds population, people circles are rapidly joining. This includes those that you might not feel as comfortable sharing private jokes or late night tales with. It’s old news that parents are connecting with their children over Facebook. According to the Atlantic “80 percent of parents who use social media have friended their children on Facebook”.  This mincing of cultures  is contributing to our social stress. You can no longer tailor your work dynamic for some and your social for others. The author of the report, Ben Marder jovially sums up the situation, “Facebook used to be like a great party for all your friends where you can dance, drink and flirt. But now with your Mum, Dad and boss there the party becomes an anxious event full of potential social landmines.” The universality of social networks has created a single identity that is shared with most people we know. It appears we have given up personal complexity for convenience.

Is social media complicating your life or simplifying it? How do you avoid social media landmines?

Google search: friend or foe?

Screenshot from Google.ca

Recently, Harris Interactive conducted a Google consumer study on behalf of BrandYourself.com. An online survey regarding their Google search habits was filled out by 2, 570 US adults.

The study found that 86% of people use a Google search engine to find out more information about another. Almost a third of US adults have searched a politician, with over half stating that this influenced their voting decision. 42% of people have searched someone before conducting business with them, and 43% of people have searched a romantic interest (potential date, significant other, ex-boyfriend/girlfriend.)

While it may be obvious to some that having a good online presence is crucial to maintaining a positive digital identity, the results of this study enforce this for those who may need a gentle reminder. Interestingly, when talk of Google searches and digital identity arises, most of the focus is placed on the person that is being searched, rather than the person who is doing the searching. This is evident in this recent Harris Interactive study.

This is understandable, of course. But for the sake of argument, what of the digital identity of the person who is doing the searching? Buzzfeed posted an article outlining “Why Google, not Facebook, knows your darkest secrets.”  It argues that while Facebook “presents a mile-high view of your online social history, which while unsettling in sheer size and scope, is selective and containable, ” Google “servers are a repository of the developed world’s darkest and most heartbreaking secrets, a vast closet lined with millions of digital skeletons that, should they escape, would spare nobody.”

In 2006, a group of researchers got a hold of a large database of search logs released by AOL. Though the month-long logs from the ~650, 000 users were made anonymous, identities were soon discovered with ease; their private search queries made public. All of  sudden, online identities were undesirably linked to offline identities. And as much as we’d like to believe this tasteless move by AOL is as retired a concept as Walkmans, this digital age has proved that aspiring towards anonymity in our ever-increasingly connected world is, while ideal, simply unrealistic.

Are you aware that Google is tracking you through all its available services?  Do you know how to erase your digital path? Have you thought about what your search history may reveal about you?

We know of the increasing concerns of privacy and security in social networks. Why should we treat search engines like Google any different? If complete control and privacy is what we seek, perhaps Google is not the place to begin our search.

 

 

Election 2024

National Archival Photo of Women Campaigning for Truman

Image Source: the National Archives of the United States
http://todaysdocument.tumblr.com/

Despite residing in Canada, the battle for President of the United States was inescapable thanks to Facebook and social media. It was common for friends of friends to wage comment wars. Despite an individual’s political beliefs, one thing everyone could be excited about was the end of the election related interactions on social media.
Social media presents the opportunity to make a public statement about beliefs once held for election day. Now people can declare themselves a fan of Obama, Romney or Binders Full of Women. After the end of the elections political statements linger on Facebook begging the question, should losers lose their likes?
After Mitt Romney lost the presidential election last week, he has been hemorrhaging likes from his Facebook page. According to CCN, Romney’s Facebook page loses eleven likes a minute. The rapid loss has also inspired the website “Disappearing Romney”, where you can watch the Likes disappear in real time.
2012 was the second race for the oval office with social media. It’s easy to forget that social media isn’t brand new. In 2008, Obama has a Myspace account along with his Twitter and Facebook. Tracking the tweet count during this years race wasn’t shocking as it may have been in 2008. This year, it was simply the status quo. This doesn’t mean the next election will be social media free. If anything the 2016 will move further into the internet, social media will be the majority of media created. CNET

predicts that the 2024 election will take place entirely online, “”The entire thing, front to back, all the advertising, and most likely including voting itself.”What do you think was the impact of social media in this latest election? If candidates can be liked today and disliked tomorrow, what might be in store for 2024?

Is Google redefining the meaning of research?

Image Source: technologyforschools.wordpress.com (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

The Washington DC based think tank the Pew Internet Research Center just released a study about the educational impact of the internet. Titled How Teens do research in the Digital World, the study takes aim on how the internet is changing students and their perception towards education.

The surveys were conducted over March and April this year. Over 2,400 teachers were polled from all over the United States. The results of the surveys were combined with interest groups of both Middle and High School students. The majority of both teachers and students believe that the internet usefulness as a tool provides more positive effects than negative. They also warned of the problems that the internet is creating in schools mostly impacting research.

Research is the foundation of modern education. It allows students to shape their own opinions and ideas on topics which are important to them. The Pew Internet Research Center reports back the not too shocking result that when students hear the  word “research” it translates to “Google”. This has morphed the research process from “slow process of intellectual curiosity and discovery to a fast-paced, short-term exercise aimed at locating just enough information to complete an assignment”.

What are your opinions about the results of this study? Is Google changing our ability to conduct research or do you side with a teacher quoted in the study who said,

“Considering my own students over the years, I don’t agree that digital technologies diminish students’ attention spans. I know students who will read for hours and spend extra time outside of school writing and working on projects because they are engaged and enthusiastic in learning more about topics that interest them. If anything, technology tools provide my students opportunities to participate in learning activities and extend their learning beyond the school day if they want.”

Do you need help researching online? Use the tools recommended by the Digital Tattoo Project. Don’t let Google become a synonym for research!

Purcell, Kristen et al. “How Teens Do Research in the Digital World. A survey of Advanced Placement and National Writing Project teachers finds that teens’ research habits are changing in the digital age,” Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project  November 1, 2012. 1-115. Accessed November 4, 2012.

Predditors, Redditors and the repercussions of “free speech”.

Reddit Logo

Image Source: Reddit.com (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

Anonymity is difficult to achieve in today’s media driven world.  Names are no longer simply matched with faces but also Twitter accounts, Linkedin resumes and of course Facebook profiles. Sites are slowly bringing together online and offline personas. The Internet giant YouTube is attempting to coax commenters into revealing their identities by connecting through Google Plus. Other online communities maintain the tradition that the Internet is the land of the anonymous.

Reddit is one such community.  Ranking as the 129th most popular site on the Internet, the so called “Front Page of the Internet” is a social news website which relies on user created content. This content covers an incredibly diverse variety of topics known as subreddits.  The content is created, shared and voted upon using an anonymous identity, similar to YouTube and comments sections found on many news organizations websites. This anonymous environment can create a veil of protection for hateful sexist, racist or homophobic comments. Anyone who has watched a video on YouTube knows what hate can be expressed in a anonymous public forum.

Reddit goes one step farther than YouTube by encouraging communities to anonymously discuss  abhorrent subreddit topics like r/misogyny and r/rapingwomen. As distasteful as these are the recent  uproar about Internet privacy is centered on another subreddit, r/CreepShots. CreepShots is based around taking pictures of unsuspecting women in public and posting their pictures on the forum where reddit users either up vote or down vote their appearance while making comments. The pictures are often focused on private or genital regions and never have the permission of the woman. Reddit defends these photos by labeling itself as a bastion of free speech. The site fiercely defends the rights of the user to post these pictures as the majority of photos are technically legal .

Enter Reddit user “Samantha”.  A 25 year old woman blogging under a pseudonym, Samantha was no stranger to CreepShots and decided to treat the Redditors to a taste of their own medicine by publicly exposing the offenders real life names and faces. On her blog Predditors, Samantha uncovers the true identities behind the accounts which post to CreepShots. She connects the dots between social media sites until she finds enough information for a blog post.  Her blog only receives a tiny percentage of visits compared to the subreddit.  The most poplar post on Predditors has 230 notes compared to a post on creepshots which can have thousands of upvotes.  Despite these limitations, Predditors continues to publicly shame perpetrators or doxxing. The act of doxxing is revealing personal information about someone which can be found by searching the Internet. Earlier this month Gawker doxxed Reddit “violentacrez” for posting sexually explicit images of underage girls on the subreddit r/jailbait.  Gawkers story went viral and the story migrated to major news outlets like  BCC and CNN. The popularity of such stories reveal the backlash against offensive Internet behavior. Less and less people are willing to excuse Internet tolls and are beginning to fight back.

The majority of subreddits are nothing like creepshots.  Top rated subreddits like r/funny, r/worldnews and r/gaming reflect the average users interests.  The majority of Reddit is male and aged between 25 and 34.  Of the sites 35 million users  very few have contributed to subreddits like creepshots. However those who have been exposed by Predditors are becoming the new face of the social network. CreepShots has been closed down due to Samantha’s efforts. She is continuing to “doxx” Redditors, this time exposing accounts which post pictures of underage girls.

Is r/CreepShots any different then Boston T People or People of Walmart? Do the Predditors deserve to keep their privacy or did they lose that right when they posted personal information on the Internet? Either way the gap between real life identities and anonymous online personas may be much smaller than we think.

Twitter-induced panic for UBC Athletics

Photo Source: Phillip Jeffrey (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

According to campus newspaper The Ubyssey, Twitter account @UBCDimeWatch was deleted yesterday, after allegations were made against student athletes regarding their involvement with the Twitter feed and its corresponding website.

The Twitter account, said to contain non-consensual photos of and suggestive comments about UBC’s “dimes” – (attractive women worthy of top scores on the infamous ten-point scale,) was discovered by the UBC Athletics department on Tuesday night, after a tweet by UBC Insiders editor revealed that the domain name thedimewatch.com was registered to varsity hockey player Ben Schmidt. The website, which has now been made private, appears linked to the Twitter account. According to Schmidt, who has now also made his personal Twitter private, he made the site for a friend.

The evidence does seem to suggest, however, that a number of athletes, notably within the men’s hockey team, have something to do with the anonymous account. UBC Athletics called for an emergency meeting with these athletes on Wednesday, and is currently investigating the incident. UBC Director of Public Affairs Lucie MacNeill discloses that “there was some concern expressed to us,” but according to the Ubyssey, notes that “it is not UBC’s place to uncover the identity of the people behind the anonymous account.”

Student athletes have been central to many conversations regarding social media use. The last thing universities want is for the postings of their young ambassadors to poison their own reputation, and especially not that of the team or the school. While some schools have already instilled social media policies, UBC is currently in the process of developing one, in response to this incident.

A few commenters to the UBC Insiders’ article expressed their discomfort with the writer’s slant, a few attempting to clarify that the Twitter account was meant to be a satirical and humorous account, and others offended by the suggestions made that the opinions of the Twitter account reflected those of all student athletes.

Unfortunately, as we have seen time and time again, the Internet is an unforgiving place. It cares not for your intentions, and simply places your words on display at face value, often with no context. It has not been confirmed whether or not the account did have anything to do with the athletes in question, nor whether it was meant as a humorous account. However, to the outside world, it does not really matter. What third parties have observed, and can (and will) draw conclusions from is that a lewd Twitter account objectifying women has been linked to UBC, and its student athletes.

Are a few laughs worth all this fuss? Do we, capable young adults, really need someone to stand over our shoulder and police what we say and tweet?

Instead of looking out for dimes, perhaps what we need to do is begin evaluating our social media practices and ourselves in search of how we can make real change.

In the wake of Amanda Todd’s death: it’s time for us to wake up

Photo Source: YouTube (Screen grab)

All of last week and still today, my social media feeds have been flooded with news of and reflections on Amanda Todd’s story.

According to the National Post, the 15-year old Coquitlam student took her life on Wednesday as a result of a cyberbullying campaign that first took its form when she was in Grade 7. A month prior to her death, she posted a very chilling and moving YouTube video outlining her “never ending story.” Todd refrained from any verbal communication in her video, opting instead to use cue cards to share her story. Her last card read, “I have nobody. I need someone.”

As previously mentioned, reactions to her death have been overflowing on social media streams, mine included. Combinations of heartache and anger have been expressed in tweets and Facebook posts. One Facebook post, by an Elizabeth Isaak, reads, “RIP Amanda Todd, your life had purpose. Your story will live on and you will be remebered (sic) long after your tormentors are gone.”

Amanda Todd’s story is incredibly tragic. Perhaps more tragic, however, is that it is not an isolated case. According to Cyberbullying statistics from the i-SAFE foundation, more than 1 in 3 young people have experienced cyber threats online. Isaak’s post recognizes that Todd’s life had purpose. And yet, if we do not wake up to the reality that this happens everyday; that we as online citizens have a direct responsibility to each other, then the young life lost on Wednesday was for naught.

Why do we distance ourselves and wait for these tragedies to hit close to home before dedicating attention and thought to these situations? Would it be so far-fetched for social media to play a role in preventing cyberbullying, instead of in fostering it? How can we, as an online community, act to ensure this?

Seeing the community come together in the face of tragedy offers a glimmer of hope. The reflections made and the respects paid are assurance that despite it all, there are still good-hearted, properly-minded people in this world. However, if we do not sincerely learn from Amanda Todd and her story; if we fail to move beyond written and spoken reflection, then we will surely find ourselves time and time again in the aftermath of tragedy after tragedy.

October is National Anti-Bullying Month. In remembrance of Amanda Todd, let’s make it count.

__

UBC has a number of resources and services for students, faculty and staff for preventing suicide. For more information, please visit http://www.students.ubc.ca/livewelllearnwell/suicide/